|

Claudio Innocenti is the
winner of the first Napoleonic Historical Society Prize for the best paper
on Napoleonic History written by a cadet at the U.S. Military Academy at
West Point We woukld likew to thank Major Michael Bonura of the
History Department at West Point for his assistance in making this award
possible.
Cadet Innocenti, who hails from San Francisco, was recently graduated
from the Academy and is now serving as an armor officer at Fort Lewis, WA.
We congratulate him on his graduation and his authorship of this fine
Napoleonic study.
SOULS NOT WANTING:
THE MARSHALATE’S
BETRAYAL OF NAPOLEON
By Claudio Innocenti
"Sire, the army will obey its
leaders." With these words, Marshal Michel Ney, at the head of a cabal of
French marshals, mutinied against Emperor Napoleon I on the morning of April
3, 1814, at Fontainebleau. Napoleon wanted to attack the Allied occupying
army in Paris, but his marshals refused to carry on with the campaign. Two
days later, Marshal Auguste Marmont ordered his corps straight into the
center of the Allied army, where it surrendered. Thus, Napoleon was betrayed
by men who he had fought with for over fifteen years, and without the
support of these men he was forced to abdicate his throne. Napoleon, with
the marshals leading his corps, had won countless victories while
campaigning in Italy, Egypt, Spain, Germany, Austria, Poland, the Balkans,
and Russia. Ironically, Napoleon’s most desperate campaign, fought in 1814
to save both his throne and his country, was ended by the very men he most
counted on to defend France: his marshals.
In 1814, France faced the
prospect of an enemy invasion for the first time in nearly twenty years.
Napoleon suffered 500,000 casualties in Russia in 1812 and again in Germany
in 1813, and in 1814 he faced a coalition of four major powers and numerous
smaller nations that would invade France from the south, the southeast, and
the east. Napoleon’s maneuvers with his small army were some of his finest,
but the Allies steadily advanced through France anyways and captured Paris
in three months. Even then, Napoleon felt he could convince the citizens of
Paris to attack the Allies inside the city, while he cut off the Allied
lines of communication with his field army. It was at this moment that his
senior marshals turned on him. Once the Allies saw that even Napoleon’s
oldest comrades would no longer fight by his side, they demanded that
Napoleon abdicate. Most historians argue that Napoleon’s marshals betrayed
him because they were weary of nearly twenty years of constant war, because
they did not want to see Paris destroyed, and because they felt they could
spare France from further destruction by forcing Napoleon to give up his
throne. These reasons certainly contributed to the betrayal; however, it was
Napoleon’s miscommunications during the 1814 campaign which led to severe
defeats of the marshals’ individual corps, and which ultimately severed the
link between them and Napoleon.

The Campaign in France, 1814 by Meissonier
War weariness certainly existed
in France in 1814, and not just in the army. Unlike in 1792, when the French
nation rose up in arms to drive out several limited Allied invasions, there
was no levee en masse in 1814. The French people, having been at war
for over twenty years, were approaching the limits of their endurance. Of
the 936,500 men Napoleon called up to fight in January 1814, only 120,000
actually joined the army. France did not lack manpower, but rather a
willingness to continue supporting their emperor. Napoleon, facing a massive
invasion in 1814, relied on the same senior officers who had not stopped
fighting since the French Revolution broke out. Some historians like Peter
Young point to the exhaustion of the marshalate by 1814: Marshal Claude
Augeareau, savior at Castiglione in 1796, saw his entire corps wiped out at
Eylau in 1807; Marmont, hero of Marengo in 1800, lost an army at Salamanca
in 1812; Ney, the "Bravest of the Brave," was most renowned for saving a few
thousand men from an already shattered Grande Armee in the Russian
retreat. Napoleon’s most experienced marshals had seen their fair share of
victories, but the recent spell of enormous defeats coupled with constant
fighting began to take a toll on these commanders. Even between 1809 and
1812, when there was no major continental power to fight, Napoleon, rather
than resting his marshals, simply rotated them into new theaters like Spain
and the Balkans. David Chandler’s detailed study of all of Napoleon’s
campaigns supports this concept of war weariness among Napoleon’s senior
generals, even though it took twenty-two years of non-stop warfare before
they were finally willing to stop fighting. While war weariness certainly
accumulated over time, in 1814 the marshals still fought tenaciously against
overwhelming odds. It is possible that they overcame their own exhaustion in
order to defend their homeland, or perhaps they were professional soldiers
fully capable of seeing a war through to its end. Nevertheless, war
weariness played a role in the marshals’ decision to betray Napoleon, even
though it does not fully explain why these career soldiers finally turned
their backs on him.
Paris was the administrative,
cultural, and commercial center of France in 1814, and the marshals did not
want to fight in the city. However, some memoirs of French officers
claim that their troops were certainly willing to attack an Allied-occupied
Paris. Still, many of the marshals, high-ranking generals who were also part
of the Napoleonic aristocracy, had family or property in Paris, and so they
were wary of attacking the French capital for personal reasons. Because an
attack on Paris would require its citizens to tie down Allied troops in
hand-to-hand fighting, the potential damage to the city was significant. In
fact, the men ultimately charged with defending the capital, Marshal Marmont
and Marshal Edouard Mortier, fought for less than a day in front of Paris.
As soon as the Allies approached the city itself, the marshals quickly
signed an armistice that ensured the city would suffer no further damage.
Frederick Maycock believed that this refusal to fight inside of Paris was
evidence of a general fear among the marshalate that Paris would be damaged.
Once Paris was occupied, the rest of the marshals believed the war was over,
and they opposed a full-scale attack by Napoleon’s army and the Parisian mob
that would destroy more of their beloved capital. Throughout the marshals’
memoirs, they often claimed that they did not want to attack Paris and see
it destroyed as Moscow was in 1812. The marshals were simply not willing to
sacrifice the political and cultural heart of France to the uncertainty of
battle. Nevertheless, they were experienced, professional soldiers raised
from the ranks of the French army, and they would probably have supported an
attack on Paris if they felt it could end the Allied invasion.
Unfortunately, by April 1814 the marshals had lost faith in Napoleon’s
ability to secure a victory, because his inability to communicate his
strategy led to disastrous defeats for the French army during the campaign.
While the marshals were not eager to attack Paris, they were even less eager
to continue following Napoleon, whose repeated miscommunications were the
primary reason the Allies captured Paris.
The marshals would later argue
that they mutinied at Fontainebleau to save the rest of France from
Napoleon’s refusal to negotiate a peace. The marshals believed that by
keeping the main army intact, they could negotiate from a position of
strength, and force the Allies to compromise with Napoleon. Once the Allies
were in Paris, the marshals believed an attack on the city would fail, so
they mutinied to spare France from Napoleon’s stubborn willingness to
continue fighting. The marshals’ mutiny convinced Napoleon to abdicate in
favor of his son, eliminating the real obstacle to peace: Napoleon himself.
David Markham argues that the marshals, by abandoning Napoleon while he
still had an unbeaten army in the field, believed they could ensure the
Bonaparte dynasty continued to rule France. Even some Russian historians
like Alan Palmer argue that the marshals mutinied in order to show Napoleon
that peace must be sought out at all costs. If the army was destroyed in an
attack on Paris, the Allies would be able to impose any sort of peace they
wanted on a defenseless France. On the other hand, if Napoleon destroyed the
Allied army in Paris, then he might return to conquering the rest of Europe
and restoring his military supremacy on the continent. The marshals could
only ensure a Bonapartist succession if the army appeared willing to die to
the very end for Napoleon’s sake. But the mutiny at Fontainebleau and the
defection of Marmont’s corps made the army, still strong and capable of
fighting, appear weak and disunited. Although Napoleon refused to negotiate
after losing an entire army in Russia in 1812 and again in Germany in 1813,
the marshals did not force him to make peace. Ironically, when Napoleon had
a rapidly growing and intact army south of Paris in April 1814, the marshals
finally did force peace on him. It was not just that they were tired of his
refusal to negotiate; they were tired of how his inability to communicate
had cost them the 1814 campaign, and so they betrayed him to end the war.
These schools of thought address
in some way why the marshals felt disenfranchised and ultimately turned on
Napoleon. They were certainly weary of war, but these were tough men who had
fought in dozens of engagements in every major country on the continent, and
they all stubbornly fought throughout the entire 1814 campaign despite their
length of service. Only when Paris fell did the marshals truly feel they
needed to try and force peace on Napoleon. They were wary of damaging Paris,
but they would probably have agreed to attack the city if they had
confidence in the plan of attack and in their commander. They were tired of
Napoleon’s refusal to negotiate with the Allies even after Paris was
occupied. Although they were shocked that Napoleon had no intention of
making peace, he had suffered severe defeats in previous campaigns and had
not made peace with the Allies then. The main reason they no longer believed
in Napoleon was because of his failure to communicate his strategic vision
and operational plans to them. Throughout the campaign, marshals commanding
small corps were left to their own devices, while Napoleon was off elsewhere
trying to achieve a decisive battle. While the entire point of the corps
system was to use individual corps to tie up enemy forces while one
concentrated at a certain point, this is not how the 1814 campaign played
out. Instead, the marshals often found themselves with a few divisions and
no clear directions, whilst facing much larger Allied formations. If the
marshals withdrew, they gave up key territory that could not be easily
recovered and would be chastised by Napoleon for it; if they stayed and
fought, they would see their smaller units consumed up by the Allied
juggernaut.
By failing to clearly
communicate either his strategy or his plans, Napoleon left the marshals
only two choices when facing an Allied army: withdraw and abandon key
territory, or fight and suffer horrendous casualties. The Allied invasion
began in January 1814 and made significant headway while Napoleon remained
in Paris to reorganize his armies. But in late January Napoleon took command
of his field forces, and began a series of maneuvers that almost destroyed
the Allied coalition in February. Key miscommunications prevented decisive
victories against the Allies, and made the marshals feel that the campaign
was simply dragging on for no reason. In March, the Allies regrouped and
drove on Paris, and Napoleon’s inability to communicate led to outright
defeats. After these losses, Napoleon marched away from Paris and left some
of his marshals on their own to defend the capital, causing them to suffer
additional defeats and lose Paris. Finally, after Paris fell at the end of
March, Napoleon sought to bring the Allies to battle in his capital. He
failed to convince his marshals of the need to attack, and also of the
probability that it would succeed. By then, the marshals were fed up with
Napoleon’s failure to communicate, and they betrayed him in order to stop
the war.
LOST VICTORIES, FEBRUARY 1814
The Allies crossed the Rhine
River and invaded French territory on January 1, 1814. They wanted to
prevent Napoleon from rebuilding his army after his crushing defeat at
Leipzig, and so the usually cautious Allies instead opted for a winter
campaign. While Napoleon raised new formations from cadres drawn from Spain
and Italy, he left his marshals with the remnants of his main army (about
100,000 men) to cover a 300-mile line stretching from the Netherlands to
Switzerland. Marshal Jacques Macdonald held a typical command on the left
bank of the Rhine: while assigned 60,000 men by Napoleon, he was given only
13,000, and had a mobile force of just 3,000 men to counter any Allied river
crossings. The marshals retreated from their defensive line on the Rhine in
the face of two Allied armies totaling over 300,000 men, and French units
began withdrawing westwards into the heart of France. Eventually, Napoleon
took direct command of his armies and was able to win a series of victories,
even though his poor communication with his marshals prevented these
victories from being decisive.

Position of Mortier’s Old Guard Relative to Prussian
Army of Silesia, 26 January, 1814
Napoleon repeatedly failed to
ensure his marshals knew his operational plans for conducting the 1814
campaign. When Napoleon left Paris with a small force of 35,000 men, he
decided to attack the unsuspecting Prussian Army of Silesia at Brienne on
January 29, 1814. Napoleon wanted to launch a frontal attack on the
Prussians, while Marshal Edouard Mortier’s 10,000-man Old Guard attacked the
Prussian rear. Mortier’s original orders from Napoleon, dated January 27,
had him marching either southeast to Bar-sur-Aube or northeast to Vitry,
depending on where the Old Guard was when the letter reached Mortier. While
Napoleon was flexible with his orders and gave Mortier some latitude on
which direction to go based on when the marshal received the order, this
letter simply prevented a confused Mortier from marching to Brienne in time
to attack the Prussian rear. When Napoleon finally did revise his orders and
clearly specified that Mortier should come to Brienne, only one messenger
was sent, and he was captured. Field Marshal Gebhardt von Blücher, the
Prussian commander, extricated his men from the trap at Brienne, suffered
only a minor defeat, and concentrated his forces away from Napoleon’s main
body. Marshal Louis Berthier, Napoleon’s chief of staff, usually sent orders
via three messengers on three different routes. That this did not happen at
Brienne, the first battle Napoleon fought on French soil in 1814, showed a
certain amount of sloppiness in the French victory. While one mistake does
not mean the entire French system of communication was inefficient, on this
occasion it prevented a decisive victory. The indecisive victory was the
price Napoleon paid for keeping less capable subordinates under his
immediate control. The men most adapt at independent command, like Marshals
Louis Davout and Jean Soult, commanded their own forces in far off areas
like Germany and Spain. However, in France Napoleon kept a tighter rein not
only on his operations, but also the marshals leading corps under his direct
command. Napoleon relied on these marshals to carry out his plans, but the
marshals he picked for this campaign were those most in need of
micromanagement and clear communication. Napoleon failed to specify his plan
for attacking a larger coalition, and for destroying its individual armies
in detail.
If Mortier had known exactly how
Napoleon wanted him to operate, he would have known to hit the Prussian
rear, and thus the loss of a messenger and unclear orders would not have
prevented Napoleon from crushing a surprised Prussian army.

Isolation of
Macdonald’s Eleventh Corps, 1-7 February, 1814
While Napoleon’s
miscommunications prevented the marshals under his direct command from
winning decisive victories, marshals separated from Napoleon had even
greater difficulty understanding Napoleon’s strategy for the campaign.
Marshal Macdonald’s Eleventh Corps was in a key central location on the
Aisne River to cover four distinct areas assigned to it, but it could barely
defend any one of the towns left under its charge. Flush with victory at
Brienne, Napoleon ordered Macdonald to keep his troops near St. Menehould to
protect Chalons (to the west), Vitry (to the southwest), Rheims (to the
northwest), and watch the exits from the Ardennes forest (to the northeast).
Napoleon also promised Macdonald additional instructions, forcing Macdonald
to sit and wait for further orders while guarding over 45 miles of front
with his tiny corps of 10,000 men. Once again, Napoleon was concentrating
his forces elsewhere, this time near Brienne in order to strike the
Prussians and defeat them in detail. Meanwhile, Macdonald was left near St.
Menehould and told to sit there while Napoleon dealt with an enemy 55 miles
to the south. At the same time, Napoleon ordered 3,000 Polish troops located
at Vitry, and two battalions of infantry garrisoned at Chalons, to move to
Brienne. With only a small army under his command, Napoleon certainly needed
to divert troops from other areas to increase the striking power of his own
command, but he made several critical errors with this message. These
reinforcements were available anytime between January 24 (when Napoleon took
command of a field army) and January 29 (when the battle at Brienne was
fought). Since Napoleon only asked for them on January 31, they would not
reach him until after he was defeated by a Prussian counterattack at La
Rothiere on February 1. This also took away garrisons from two of the towns
Macdonald was defending, and both of those towns were located between
Napoleon and Macdonald. When General Hans Yorck’s Prussian corps advanced
through this area in the first week of February, Macdonald lacked the
strength to conduct even a fighting withdrawal to slow down Yorck’s men.
Thus, Napoleon’s untimely reallocation of garrisons forced Macdonald to
abandon Chalons without a fight. While in January the marshals gave ground
near the Rhine because they lacked the strength to stand up to the Allies,
in February the marshals gave ground because Napoleon expected them to
defend critical areas of France without clear orders or enough troops to
fight. While this may have worked if Napoleon secured a victory, his defeat
at La Rothiere meant that both his main army, and detached corps like those
of Macdonald, had to retreat. Some of the reasons for Macdonald’s mutiny in
April could easily be traced to this situation, where Napoleon put one of
his marshals in an impossible position.

Napoleon’s Concentrated Attacks on the Army of
Silesia, 10 February, 1814
While encountering some troubles
in the early stages of his campaign, Napoleon rallied his forces and won a
series of indecisive victories against the Allies. His strategy of defeating
the Allies in detail was actually made easier by his own defeat at La
Rothiere. The Prussians were rapidly advancing towards Paris and thus moving
away from their Austrian and Russian allies. Originally, Napoleon wanted to
attack the Austro-Russian Army of Bohemia near Bar-sur-Aube, but he told his
wife, the Empress Marie-Louise, that he had to "sacrifice everything else to
the necessity of covering Paris." Seeing the Army of Silesia strung out on
the road to Paris, Napoleon decided to muster 30,000 men in three corps
(under Marmont, Mortier, and Ney) to attack the Prussians. He routed the
advance guard under General Nikolay Olsufiev at Champaubert on February 10,
and then pushed on to defeat the isolated corps of Generals Yorck and Fabian
Sacken at Montmirail on February 11. Thus, the Army of Silesia was halted
with Napoleon’s army to its southwest and Macdonald’s corps to its
northwest. Napoleon, writing to Marmont, claimed that Macdonald was fighting
his way east to Montmirail and would soon appear in the rear of the Prussian
army there. Instead, Macdonald’s isolated corps had to cut through Prussian
forces just to reach Napoleon, and it could not arrive in time to cut off
the retreating Prussians. As a result, Montmirail was simply another
indecisive French victory: although Napoleon drove back two Allied corps,
the Allies lost just 3,300 men while the French lost 2,100. Napoleon failed
to make a conscious effort to instruct his subordinates on his plan of
operations, but he still expected his marshals to do what he wanted without
really telling them.
Since Napoleon preferred keeping
a tight leash on his subordinates during this campaign, his marshals
hesitated to move without express orders from the Emperor. Macdonald was an
intelligent man with experience leading large, independent formations. In
1812, he commanded 32,500 men on the left flank of Napoleon’s invasion of
Russia, which operated apart from Napoleon’s main body throughout the entire
invasion. In 1813, Macdonald even commanded his own army: the 80,000 man
Army of the Bober, although it was routed at the Battle of the Katzbach.
Macdonald was capable of at least corps-level command and independent
action, but in February 1814, he had an unspecified number of Prussians in
front of his men during the action at Montmirail. Considering he spent the
previous week retreating in the face of this same force, he hesitated to
advance against the Prussians without clear orders from Napoleon, which
Macdonald never received. While in the midst of battle at Montmirail,
Napoleon wrote to his brother Joseph on February 11 that he "supposed the
Duke of Taranto [Macdonald]" would arrive in the rear of the Prussian army
(located at Chateau-Thierry), and thus help secure a great victory with the
destruction of two Allied corps. Instead, Macdonald, after seemingly being
abandoned near St. Menehould and then forced to abandon Chalons without a
fight, simply rejoined Napoleon’s main army, having somehow failed to
discern his emperor’s plans for this part of the campaign. In his memoirs,
Macdonald claimed that "these victories had no result save that of
prolonging our agony," demonstrating his later dissatisfaction with
Napoleon’s inability to organize a decisive victory against the Allies.
While by the time he wrote his memoirs Macdonald knew the outcome of the
1814 campaign, he still took the time to mention the futility of the
half-victories of February. Still, as long as the French were victorious,
miscommunications were merely a characteristic of Napoleon’s campaign style,
and not an obstacle that would cost him the campaign and ultimately drive
his marshals away.

Exposed Position of Marmont’s Sixth Corps’ After the
Battle of Vauchamps,
and Napoleon’s Shift South Against the Army of Bohemia, 16 February, 1814
While previously Napoleon’s
miscommunications left other corps too weak to fight on their own, as the
campaign progressed Napoleon’s orders left corps under his direct command
strung out and vulnerable to defeat. The Emperor ordered a pursuit after
Montmirail, and defeated Yorck’s corps again at Chateau-Thierry. This time,
the Prussians retreated over the Marne River, which put a halt to the French
pursuit north. Napoleon sent Marmont’s Sixth Corps east to assist in the
pursuit of other retreating elements of the Prussian army. The Bulletin of
the Grande Armee of 15 February, printed in Paris, actually claimed
that Blücher’s Army of Silesia was annihilated in three days. While Napoleon
often embellished his army bulletins, he did not believe he exaggerated this
one, especially since he left only a small, under strength corps chasing
after an entire army he believed incapable of resistance. Inevitably,
Marmont ran into a concentrated Prussian force nearly twice his size at
Etoges, and soon retreated west to Vauchamps to rejoin the main French
force. This Prussian advance, after driving back Marmont’s corps, was wedged
between Napoleon’s army to the north and Marshal Claude Victor’s Second
Corps at Sezanne to the south. Napoleon had dangerously overestimated the
extent of his three previous victories, and believed the Prussian army to be
broken and demoralized. Napoleon’s erroneous estimation of his own victories
clearly convinced him to keep Marmont’s tiny corps chasing after an entire
army that he believed no longer capable of resistance. Instead, Marmont
barely managed to rescue his men from this tricky situation, and the
Prussians chose to move north rather than to attack Victor’s vulnerable
flank.
Eventually, Napoleon secured
another victory over the Prussians, and he finally felt he could forget
about them and concentrate entirely against the Austrians. Marmont had
nearly met with disaster, and Victor had almost found his men facing the
combined weight of the two Allied armies. Nevertheless, on February 14 the
Prussians were finally routed at Vauchamps and lost nearly 7,000 men. Once
again, despite his poor communication, the French Emperor was able to pull
off a victory. Napoleon believed he had knocked the 80,000 man Army of
Silesia out of the war, and once more he left Marmont and Mortier on their
own while he moved south to face larger threats. While the marshals were
certainly glad to be back on the winning side, these victories cost the much
smaller French army a significant number of casualties, and Napoleon’s
miscommunication prevented the total destruction of the Prussian army. In
particular, Marmont’s men constantly marched back and forth due to
Napoleon’s ever-changing and unclear orders, and eventually such orders had
led them straight into the heart of the Prussian army. Marmont was saved
from Napoleon’s mistakes by the emperor himself at Vauchamps, but serious
fractures began to appear not only in Napoleon’s communications with his
marshals, but in his relationships with these men.
Occupied with fighting the
Prussians in the north, Napoleon gave far less concern to his subordinates
facing a much larger Austro-Russian army. Marshals Nicolas Oudinot’s Seventh
Corps (25,000 men) and Victor’s Second Corps (14,000 men) held the line of
the Seine River in the face of Field Marshal Karl Schwarzenberg’s 150,000
man Army of Bohemia. On February 12, this Allied force finally crossed the
Seine, and Victor and Oudinot simply could not hold the river line in the
face of such overwhelming odds. Napoleon ordered Oudinot (with Victor
providing support) to defend the bridges at Bray, Montereau, Pont-sur-Yonne,
Moret, and Montargis. In the face of such an impossible order, Oudinot
withdrew northwards, and this forced Victor to withdraw in this direction as
well. Although by February 16, Napoleon had defeated the Army of Silesia and
sent it reeling, the larger Army of Bohemia moved inexorably forward and
threatened to both uncover Napoleon’s rear and advance on Paris. Napoleon
had given Oudinot and Victor a task they could not accomplish, and had left
them to fend for themselves on the Seine while he tried to bring the
Prussians to a decisive battle. Convincing himself for the second time in
two days that the Prussian army was destroyed and no longer a threat,
Napoleon moved south with the bulk of his army. On February 16, Napoleon
linked up with Oudinot and Victor near the Yerres River, and over the next
two days he attacked southwards at Mormant and then Montereau. In the
resulting battles the Allies lost 8,000 men and retreated back over the
Seine. Napoleon ordered Victor to seize the bridge at Montereau to prevent
the Austrians from retreating, but Victor’s corps fought from dawn until
7:00 p.m., at which time it finally did seize the bridge, albeit too late to
do anything useful. Once again, Napoleon’s communication system appeared to
break down at the critical juncture between a minor victory and a decisive
battle. He ordered Victor’s men, leading the advance guard of his army, to
cut through the enemy army and seize a bridge in its rear, while at the same
time preventing the Allies from escaping over it. If Victor was sent on some
sort of flanking maneuver, this may well have been possible, but there was
no way his corps could push a much larger Allied army back over a bridge,
then somehow seize that same bridge and prevent the Allies from crossing.
Victor lost his corps command for his tardy arrival at the bridge at
Montereau, even though he would later receive two Young Guard divisions by
Napoleon anyways. Due to Napoleon’s poor communication with his corps
commanders in 1814, Victor almost found his corps trapped between the two
Allied armies two different times, and at the same time he had to maintain
an impossible defense of the Seine. Victor was relieved after winning a
fierce battle against much larger odds just because he could not accomplish
a feat that was physically impossible. With one of their own demoted after
such a battle, the other marshals also began to notice the narrow margins by
which they were winning victories. It was only a matter of time before
Napoleon’s miscommunications led to disastrous results for the marshals,
their soldiers, and for France.
DEFEAT CREEPS IN, FEBRUARY-MARCH
1814
With his minor victories in
February, Napoleon drove off the Allied armies, but he did not decisively
defeat them. He still held the critical central position, with the Army of
Silesia astride the Marne River to his north, while the Army of Bohemia was
still on the Seine River to his south. In March, Napoleon repeated
practically the same strategy he used in February, beginning with a strike
against the still-recovering Prussians under Blücher. The Prussians were
certainly in a vulnerable position as their main body was located between
the Marne and Aisne Rivers. Having already succeeded in defeating the
Prussians in early February, Napoleon felt he could destroy their army
completely this time around. Instead, poor communication on his part would
lead to a series of outright defeats against the Prussians and then against
the Austrians. Napoleon still depended on his marshals for victory, but both
the marshals under his direct command and those with their own commands were
constantly misinformed or misdirected by their emperor. These
miscommunications inevitably led to defeats against far larger Allied
armies, and the marshals saw this failure to communicate plans effectively
was no longer just preventing decisive French victories: it was costing
France the war.

The Position of the Main Allied and French Formations
at the Conclusion of the First Part of the 1814 Campaign, February 24, 1814
By failing to clarify his
operational plans, Napoleon botched the opening moves of his second attack
on the Prussians. First, Napoleon left Mortier and Marmont with a force of
about 25,000 men at Meaux on the Marne to prevent any Prussian advance west
on Paris, and he told these marshals he was heading east to Chalons, and
then to the Rhine River to collect the garrisons of his eastern border
fortresses. Instead, Napoleon marched northeast, outflanked the Prussians,
and forced Blücher to either retreat or fight a battle with the Aisne to his
rear. Blücher’s only escape route over the Aisne was at Soissons, a town
garrisoned by French troops and currently being besieged by Prussian
reinforcements north of the Aisne. Napoleon gave little concern to Soissons
surrendering before he could destroy Blücher’s main body, because he
believed that Marmont and Mortier were both marching to the relief of
Soissons. But Marmont and Mortier were still on the Marne waiting for orders
to move north: they had not been expecting a rapid march against the
Prussians so soon, and so they failed to ensure Soissons remained under
French control. Napoleon had not communicated the importance of Soissons to
those two marshals; in fact, their position on the Marne was meant to
prevent a Prussian advance on Paris, not to facilitate a rapid strike north
against the Prussian flank. Actually, Napoleon told Marmont and Mortier he
was heading in a completely different direction with the goal of gathering
reinforcements, not attacking the Prussian army. Thus, while Napoleon
wondered at their lack of aggression, the marshals were frustrated with
Napoleon’s repeated failures to be clear with them. They could not follow
Napoleon’s plans if they had no idea what his real plans were. As a result
of this failure to communicate, Soissons surrendered almost without a fight,
Blücher was able to retreat north, and his army was reinforced to 100,000
men by joining with reserves north of the Aisne. Napoleon was greatly
displeased with Marmont in particular, whom he had expected to relieve
Soissons. He told Minister of War Henri Clarke that it was "annoying that
Marmont has some talents, but cannot get rid of his stupidity." When
Napoleon suddenly changed his plan for the opening days of March, he
apparently expected men like Marmont to understand where he was going and
what he was doing, and then was perfectly willing to blame his subordinates
for his own failure to communicate. While in February Napoleon’s
miscommunications prevented the achievement of a decisive victory, in March
the lack of such a victory greatly increased the threat to France’s
interior. Blücher’s army grew to twice the size of Napoleon’s army, and the
Prussians were concentrated in one area, making them a far greater threat
than the scattered force Napoleon routed in February.

Napoleon’s Advarnce Against the Exposed Positions of
the Army of Silesia, February 27, 1814
The marshals’ dependence on
Napoleon’s communication led to a bloody defeat that drastically altered
Napoleon’s campaign plan. First, he combined the corps of Mortier and
Marmont with his main body, and crossed the Aisne. At Craonne on March 7,
Napoleon launched a frontal attack against the Prussians and inflicted 5,000
casualties, forcing Blücher to retire from the battlefield. Blücher amassed
his entire army on a ridgeline in front of Laon, strongly supported by a
series of defended villages. Napoleon, with barely 40,000 men, decided on a
two-pronged attack on March 9: Mortier and Ney would attack the Prussian
right, while Napoleon presumed that Marmont’s Sixth Corps would attack the
Prussian left when they reached the battlefield. But Marmont’s corps marched
to Laon by a different road than the rest of Napoleon’s army, so when
Marmont arrived on the field at 1:00 p.m., he was nearly five miles from
Napoleon, and had not received any direct communications from the emperor in
several days. In order to ensure that Napoleon really wanted Marmont’s
10,000-man corps to attack half of the Prussian army on a defended ridge,
the marshal dispatched his corps of cavalry to remain in contact with the
main body of the French army.

Battle
of Laon, March 9-10, 1814
Marmont, seemingly desperate for orders from
Napoleon, used up his cavalry screen to ensure he had a link with the
emperor. His men attacked the village of Athies and achieved some success,
but they spent the rest of the day camped on the battlefield. With no
pickets or cavalry guarding the French position, Prussian cavalry attacked
into Marmont’s rear at 7:00 p.m., and reported that there was an entire
French corps isolated from Napoleon’s main force. Two entire Prussian corps
attacked Marmont’s formation and routed it, forcing Napoleon to retreat from
the battlefield, this time having failed to achieve even a small victory
against the Prussians. While Marmont certainly bares the blame for not
ensuring his men were well-guarded when they encamped for the evening, in
truth he simply did not expect to face as large a Prussian force as he did
when he reached the battlefield. Napoleon could not afford to leave an
intact Prussian army operating in France, so he was forced to attack it, and
called up all immediately available units to fight at Laon. When Marmont
arrived at Laon, he saw a larger enemy army in a more concentrated area, and
fatally dispatched his cavalry to keep his corps in contact with Napoleon.
After the defeat Napoleon wrote to his brother Joseph, claiming that the
Prussians would have evacuated Laon out of fear of a French attack, if not
for the rout of Marmont, "whose behavior was that of an ensign." It was bad
enough that Napoleon’s lack of communication left Marmont isolated and
forced him to dispatch his cavalry screen; for Napoleon to place the entire
loss of the battle on Marmont’s shoulders seemed absurd to the man who had
just watched his entire corps routed in a few hours. While Marmont was
certainly willing to continue fighting against immeasurable odds to defend
France, he was beginning to tire of being placed in poor positions by his
commander, and he certainly did not expect to be criticized for a failure
which arose out of Napoleon’s inability to communicate.

Advance of the Army of Bohemia on Troyes and Beyond,
while Napoleon Advances Against the Army of Silesia, March 5, 1814
If Napoleon had problems
communicating with marshals under his direct command, he had even more
difficulty relaying orders to his subordinates fighting along the Seine.
With Victor no longer commanding an independent force, it was up to Oudinot
and Macdonald to hold off the Army of Bohemia. Macdonald believed he was
left in charge by Napoleon as the senior general in the sector, even though
both men received their marshal’s baton in 1809 after Wagram. Napoleon
initially wanted to relieve his fortresses at the beginning of March, a plan
which caused a great deal of confusion to the marshals under his command,
especially once Napoleon changed his plans without warning and attacked the
Prussians instead. It was the same for Macdonald and Oudinot, who were led
to believe that Napoleon would march east, relieve besieged French
garrisons, and operate in the Allied rear, thus forcing Schwarzenberg to
abandon his line on the Seine. Instead, Napoleon attacked the Prussians, and
Schwarzenberg, free from concern of any sudden maneuvers on his flank or
rear, concentrated his entire army against Oudinot’s corps. Oudinot was
easily outflanked and forced to abandon Troyes, the key city to operations
on the lower Seine, on March 4. Without a clear leader among them, Oudinot
and Macdonald constantly disagreed with each other, and they acted
independently of each other, rather than trying to work together to delay
the Austro-Russian behemoth. In response to this disunity, Macdonald wrote
that, despite the critical nature of their situation (the Seine River led
all the way to Paris), neither he nor Oudinot had any "news from the
emperor, though not because [they] had not sent him warning." Napoleon’s
marshals understood that he could concentrate his main army against only a
certain enemy force at any one time, and that this would leave other areas
more vulnerable to attack. In fact, this was true of all of Napoleon’s
campaigns since 1796: concentrate individual corps against a certain element
of the enemy’s force, and decisively defeat it before the enemy could attack
one’s own weak points. But in 1814, the marshals far from Napoleon’s main
force, and in command of such weak points, lacked the strength to hold off
the Allied armies, and more importantly they lacked a clear outline of
Napoleon’s strategy.
Neither Oudinot nor Macdonald
could be expected to hold off the Army of Bohemia on their own, and without
clear orders from Napoleon they were not really sure what to do once they
retreated from Troyes. Napoleon was furious with the loss of the city,
claiming he "left a splendid army and excellent cavalry at Troyes," and the
real failure was that "the souls [of his marshals were] wanting." Napoleon
blamed his marshals for derailing his plans, but he had never clearly told
them his plans, even when they asked for specific directions. It was
Napoleon’s inability to leave clear orders for his subordinates, to let them
know what his own plans were, and to leave a clear commander in charge that
forced Oudinot and Macdonald to lose Troyes and retreat forty miles to the
northwest. If Troyes was vital to the entire French defensive position, then
Napoleon’s orders needed to include a command to hold the city at all costs.
He did not do this, so the marshals felt Troyes could simply be abandoned in
the face of overwhelming Allied superiority, thereby trading space for time.
This retreat, brought on by Napoleon’s inability to clearly organize his
orders, forced Napoleon to abandon his campaign against the undefeated
Prussians. On March 16, Napoleon fatefully decided to march his main force
south to fight the advancing Austro-Russian army. His poor communication had
already led to individual French units being mauled against the Prussians;
Napoleon was forced to leave the intact Prussian army in his rear, and
attack an even larger Allied army that was advancing freely on the Seine
because Napoleon had failed to provide clear orders to Macdonald and Oudinot.
Napoleon’s plan to concentrate
against one enemy army in the Allied coalition could only work if his
marshals knew when and where to concentrate. Having failed to defeat the
Prussians, Napoleon also lacked the strength to defeat the larger
Austro-Russian army. With barely 28,000 men under his command, he suffered
another defeat at Arcis-sur-Aube on March 20 against an Allied army of
nearly 100,000 men. Napoleon decided to move to the northeast, setting up
the decisive final days of the campaign. Marmont and Mortier had 25,000 men
to defend the approaches to Paris against the Army of Silesia. Napoleon,
with Ney, Macdonald, and Oudinot under his own command, was to the east of
both of the main Allied armies. Although Napoleon felt this position would
be advantageous to his operations, it proved disastrous to his strategic
plans. Napoleon, seeing that his army was no longer a match for Allied
numbers, decided to try and raise the size of his own force. But as the
Allies drew closer to Paris, Napoleon continued to conduct operations
without informing his marshals of what his plans were. They were either left
to fend for themselves against the Allied advance, or Napoleon simply
ignored them. Even if Napoleon could win battles on his own, he could not be
everywhere at once, and he needed his marshals to perform well if he wanted
to win the campaign. But Napoleon’s employment of rapid corps marches to
concentrate against superior Allied forces would only succeed if his
marshals lived up to his expectations. While some marshals were capable of
operating under an overall strategic framework with no clear operational
direction, these were men like Soult and Davout, who held independent
commands in southern France and Germany, respectively. Marshals like Marmont
and Macdonald, who Napoleon picked to fight in France in 1814, were less
capable of independent command, and so Napoleon needed to clearly lay out
his plans to ensure they operated according to his strategic vision. He
failed to do so, and so his marshals could not help but fail against the
overwhelming Allied armies.
THE MARSHALS ABANDONED, LATE MARCH
1814
From March 20 until March 31,
1814, three different armies on both sides were operating between the Rhine
River and Paris. First were the combined corps of Marshals Marmont and
Mortier, 25,000 men defending the approaches to the French capital.
Immediately to their east were the two main Allied armies, with nearly
180,000 men between them. Finally, east of this force was Napoleon’s main
army of some 30,000 troops. Napoleon, having repeatedly failed to bring
either Allied army to a decisive battle, decided he needed greater troop
strength before continuing his campaign. To accomplish this he wanted to
head east and relieve his besieged garrisons on the Rhine, while also
severing Allied lines of communications before they could march on a
weakened Paris. But Napoleon’s orders to Marmont and Mortier were
contradictory and based on erroneous intelligence, forcing both of these men
to constantly march and countermarch in the vicinity of massive Allied
armies. When Paris itself was finally threatened, Napoleon returned to his
capital, not having had time to relieve his garrisons and raise his armies.
The end result of Napoleon’s inability to direct his subordinates was that
Paris fell to the Allies, and the marshals, tired of this lack of
communication, finally turned on the Emperor.

Advance of the Allied Armies on Paris,
while Napoleon Advances East Towards the Rhine, 24 March, 1814
Napoleon relied on Marmont and
Mortier to keep the Allies from striking at Paris while he moved east, but
he simply kept them confused of his real strategy for the campaign. While he
moved south to strike the Austrians in mid-March, he ordered Marmont to
Fismes to guard the road to Paris with Mortier and "dispute every inch of
ground." But as soon as the two corps arrived in Fismes, they received
counter-orders to force-march 40 miles southeast to Chalons. Napoleon,
concentrating most of his forces against Schwarzenberg on the Seine, seemed
unsure what exactly he wanted to do with these two extra corps while he
sought a decisive engagement with the Army of Bohemia. While clear
communication was vitally important, constantly sending conflicting orders
to his marshals was no way of ensuring they understood his plans. At first,
they believed Napoleon wanted them to defend Paris, but as soon as they were
in a position to do so (at Fismes), they were told to march to a completely
different location closer to Napoleon’s main force. Recognizing that their
corps lacked the strength to defend Paris on their own, Napoleon was willing
to sacrifice Paris in return for a concentration of force east of the main
Allied armies. Unfortunately, none of these plans took into account
Blücher’s Army of Silesia, which Napoleon should have known was near Marmont
and Mortier. The two marshals, rather than driving southeast to Chalons,
were instead driven out of Rheims by the Prussians on March 19, and forced
to retreat back to Fismes. Napoleon did not take into account the
operational area of the Prussians when ordering Marmont and Mortier to join
him, resulting in another defeat for these two marshals.
Instead of altering his plans to
allow space for the operations of Allied armies close to his own forces,
Napoleon stubbornly continued to unite his entire force. On March 21,
following his defeat at Arcis-sur-Aube, Napoleon ordered Marmont and Mortier
to move to Vitry, meaning they would have to head south, cross the Marne,
and then head east to rejoin his main body. Unfortunately, Napoleon once
again failed to include a critical piece of information in his orders: both
Allied armies were directly in between him and the two marshals. Although
Napoleon clearly communicated his goal of increasing the size of his army,
he failed to communicate vital information about enemy troops in a
particular area. After marching away from the Prussians at the beginning of
the month, retreating east after losing to the Austrians, and ordering
Marmont and Mortier to defend Paris, Napoleon was well aware of where all
these forces were generally located in France. Marmont and Mortier, caught
between two Allied armies, suffered a defeat at Bussy l’Estree. Once again,
poor orders on Napoleon’s part led to a defeat his marshals lacked the
strength to recover from. Additionally, Allied troops surrounded and
destroyed a 4,000-strong National Guard division under General Pacthod that
was marching to reinforce Marmont at La Fere Champenoise on March 25. Thus,
Napoleon’s miscommunications were leading not only Marmont and Mortier to
disaster, but also preventing them from receiving desperately needed
reinforcements, since all of these formations were being ordered into the
middle of two Allied armies. The marshals were no longer simply losing
battles; they were being routed, and in close proximity to the French
capital they were defending.
Meanwhile, Napoleon’s main army
suffered from not knowing exactly where it was going or what its goal was.
Ostensibly trying to head east to the Rhine to relieve the large French
garrisons isolated there, Napoleon failed to accomplish even this modest
goal. After losing at Arcis-sur-Aube, the main French army moved northeast
towards Vitry, and found it defended. Marshal Macdonald, seeing that the
town was strongly defended, argued that Vitry could only have a large
garrison if the Austrian army was nowhere near the town; in other words,
Vitry’s garrison was simply defending Austrian lines of communication, and
not part of the main Austrian field army. This meant that the Allies were
moving west, and thus moving towards a Paris barely defended by recently
defeated French troops. Macdonald was exactly right: on March 24, the Allied
armies, tired of playing cat and mouse with Napoleon and eager to end the
campaign, finally began marching west on Paris while Napoleon stayed at
Vitry. Whereas with Marmont and Mortier Napoleon had failed to communicate
the location of the two main Allied armies, with the marshals under his
direct command Napoleon constantly switched his orders to his subordinates.
First, he erroneously believed that the Austrians were actually retreating
to the Rhine, meaning his army at Vitry would be ideally placed to cut off
and destroy them. Then, deciding to resume his advance on the Rhine, he
moved east, running into an Allied rear guard under General Ferdinand
Wintzingerode which he defeated at St. Dizier on March 26. The general
movements covering the nearly 20 miles between Vitry and St. Dizier were as
follows: Napoleon was near Vitry on March 22, near St. Dizier on March 23,
marched away from St. Dizier on March 24, returned to it on March 26 to
fight Wintzingerode, and marched back near Vitry on March 27. Such
conflicting orders, a characteristic of Napoleon’s communications during
this campaign, prevented his marshals from either decisively defeating
Wintzingerode or from concentrating on and capturing Vitry. Thus, Napoleon’s
main army was neither fighting the main Allied armies, nor destroying the
small forces it did face, nor capturing enemy-occupied towns, and certainly
not relieving garrisons on the Rhine: in short, Napoleon’s orders to his
marshals were achieving nothing. While orders that led to half-victories and
defeats were certainly not popular among the marshals, these professional
officers were probably less content with orders that accomplished nothing at
all.
On March 27, Napoleon finally
learned that, while he was marching east, the Allies were instead marching
west against a barely defended Paris. With the Allied armies much closer to
Paris than he was, Napoleon decided to change his strategy one more time,
and decided that Paris needed to be defended. Macdonald argued that by
marching back west, Napoleon would accomplish neither of his primary goals:
he would not have raised enough soldiers from his garrisons to increase his
army’s size, nor would he make it to Paris with a large enough force to
defend it from the impending Allied onslaught. Napoleon ignored Macdonald
and raced west to save Paris. While it was Napoleon’s prerogative to ignore
advice from subordinates, it was easy to see why Napoleon’s orders to his
commanders were so confusing when he constantly revised his strategy. The
marshals under his direct command, unsure whether Napoleon wanted to achieve
a military or political goal, were either left in the dark or just
misinformed about what Napoleon really wanted to accomplish.
The climax of the 1814 campaign
occurred with Marmont and Mortier defending the approach to Paris from the
Allied advance. Even as late as March 29, the people of Paris did not
believe they were facing more than 30,000 Allied troops on the outskirts of
their city. On that same day, Marmont and Mortier arrived in the city, with
only 9,600 men left under their command. The regime in Paris was left under
the command of Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s brother, and Marie Louise,
Napoleon’s wife, while the Emperor was in the field. On March 16, Napoleon,
before marching east of the Austrians and thus cutting off direct
communication with Paris, informed Joseph that he would be out of touch for
some time. Napoleon left clear instructions to Joseph on whom and what to
evacuate should Paris come under threat from the enemy. Thus, Napoleon knew
his maneuvers put Paris at risk and that he would be cut off from the
government of the city, and so he left clear orders to follow in case the
Allies captured the city. Unfortunately, Napoleon was never quite so direct
with Marmont and Mortier, so they did not know how hard a fight they were
expected to put up for the French capital. Marmont, taking charge of the
defense of the city, immediately inspected the Belleville heights when he
arrived, because he had never before studied the area around Paris as a
potential military position. This made sense because, over the last three
months, Napoleon’s strategy focused entirely on either defeating the Allied
armies, or increasing the size of the French army. Thus, while three months
was plenty of time to ensure Paris was strongly defended against any
possible attack, it never figured into Napoleon’s strategy as a place that
needed defending, and so Marmont was neither ready to nor capable of
defending it. Although Napoleon was marching at full speed to return to
Paris to save it from capture, Marmont was still operating under the idea
that Napoleon’s primary goal was restoring the French army to a credible
size. With this in mind, he put up a tough fight on March 30 in front of
Paris on the heights of Montmartre, then that evening he concluded an
armistice that allowed his soldiers to withdraw peacefully if he surrendered
Paris.
While Marmont saved the bulk of
the regular troops defending Paris, he had lost the capital, and Napoleon
was infuriated that he missed reaching his capital just a few hours before
it surrendered. He waited several days near Fontainebleau south of Paris,
gathering his forces in preparation for a strike on the Allies. While
neither Napoleon nor his marshals argued that the loss of Paris was a
disaster, Napoleon still saw an opportunity for victory. In fact, the Allied
armies were concentrated in Paris, a massive city known for its turbulent,
anti-foreign population, and Allied supply lines stretched all the way back
to the Rhine. Meanwhile, Napoleon, for the first time in three months, had
every marshal he started the 1814 campaign with under his direct command,
with all their corresponding forces. In effect, the Allied armies were tied
down occupying a large, unfriendly capital divided in two by the Seine
River, while their supply lines stretched hundreds of miles. In contrast,
Napoleon’s supply lines were extremely short, he was free to maneuver
wherever he wished, and he finally achieved a true concentration of his
army. With such advantages, Napoleon prepared for a strike against the
French capital. Unfortunately for the Emperor, on April 3 Marshals Ney,
Macdonald, Oudinot, Berthier, and Lefebvre mutinied, and refused to
contemplate carrying the war on any further. They believed Napoleon
completely botched the 1814 campaign, and could no longer carry out this
futile campaign.
The marshals were still willing
to fight to defend France even with the overwhelming odds facing her when
the Allies crossed the Rhine in January 1814. But during three months of
difficult fighting, the marshals repeatedly found themselves on the
receiving end of poor communication. They were tired, not of war, but of
Napoleon’s continued inability to clearly specify what he wanted of them.
Such miscommunication prevented victories from being truly decisive and, as
the campaign wore on, resulted in defeats of greater magnitude. While
Napoleon was the commander of the French armies, the corps that marched,
countermarched, won half-victories, and suffered disastrous defeats were led
by the marshals. It is ironic that by April 1814, when Napoleon finally
achieved a true concentration of force close to a stretched out Allied army
vulnerable to attack, the marshals were no longer willing to follow him.
They did not believe Napoleon could win even with some type of operational
advantage: the only thing the marshals could be sure of was that any order
from Napoleon to attack the Allies in Paris would be fraught with unclear
directives, and their own men would suffer the brunt of the fighting
regardless of the result. Two days after the mutiny at Fontainebleau,
Marmont’s corps defected to the Allies. Marmont’s betrayal certainly shook
Napoleon more because it involved the loss of a large part of his army.
Marmont’s betrayal was of a greater magnitude than the other marshals
because he suffered the most from Napoleon’s miscommunication. Whether it
was his corps being routed at Laon, or being ordered to maneuver in between
Allied armies, or being forced to defend Paris with no orders from the
emperor, Marmont and his men bore the consequences for Napoleon’s failures.
Marmont was also tired of being blamed by Napoleon for failing to discern
the emperor’s strategy and for failing to hold up the Allied behemoth. With
neither the strength to stand up to the Allies nor clear orders on what to
do with his men, Marmont felt he did everything he could to save Paris,
fighting until the capital itself was under fire and with little hope of
reinforcements. When Napoleon finally did arrive and wanted to attack Paris,
a city which Marmont defended almost single-handedly, the marshal finally
had enough and defected.
CONCLUSION
Napoleon’s marshals were the
heart of his army structure. The corps system Napoleon invented could not
function without intelligent, independent commanders capable of taking his
overall strategy and translating that into efficient military operations.
But by 1814, Napoleon no longer communicated so effectively with his
subordinates. The result was a series of half-victories, contradictory
maneuvers, and outright defeats that slowly infuriated the Napoleonic
marshalate. Often times, Napoleon left small corps under his marshals while
he took his main army far away to try and seek a decisive battle against
much larger Allied armies. In February and March, Napoleon targeted a
different army for destruction no fewer than four times. This meant that
every time a new target was chosen, the main French army marched rapidly to
a different part of France during the winter of 1813-1814, while relatively
small forces remained to hold off the other Allied army. Instead, the Allies
constantly kept pressure on the French, forcing Napoleon to cut short his
operations and move to whatever sector was most threatened.
The victories of February 1814
demonstrated that the marshals were certainly not weary of fighting wars, as
they displayed a great deal of vigor and intelligence in defeating much
larger Allied armies. As long as Napoleon was leading them to victory, the
marshals were also unwilling to blame him for any of France’s problems:
instead, they felt the fastest way to ensure peace was to decisively defeat
the invading Allied armies. Unfortunately, none of these victories
conclusively destroyed either the strength or the morale of either Allied
army. Napoleon’s miscommunications ensured that all of these victories took
a heavy toll on a France no longer capable of sustaining heavy casualties,
while also preventing the destruction of the Allied invaders. In March, the
routed Allied armies, resupplied and reinforced, returned in force, and
Napoleon, still on the offensive, suffered far greater casualties in a
series of poorly coordinated attacks against the Prussians and the
Austrians. He blamed his marshals for these failures, with the result that
the marshals were often castigated for Napoleon’s mistakes, or that they saw
their own corps cut up from being put in a poor position. This trend only
grew worse in the last weeks of March, when Napoleon boldly struck out east
away from the Allied armies, leaving them to face only a tiny fraction of
the total French army, and cutting that fraction up as the Allies approached
and captured Paris.
The marshals were promoted from
the ranks of the French army by Napoleon himself. He gave them wealth,
social status, and key military commands. They were a mixed bag of officers
with varying strengths and weaknesses, but they nevertheless constituted the
cream of Napoleon’s general officers. They certainly did not get soft and
content after being laden down with so many rewards: rather, their tenacious
defense of France against such overwhelming odds proved that the marshals
were still willing to fight for their country, and under Napoleon’s orders.
If the marshals were truly weary of war, they would have abandoned Napoleon
long before the Allies entered Paris. Nevertheless, the 1814 campaign saw a
growing dissatisfaction among the marshalate. They were professionals, and
general officers made unique only by distinction of holding a marshal’s
baton. They were the true heart of Napoleon’s corps system, and this system
only truly fell apart in 1814, where Napoleon attempted to exert complete
control over his forces, but did so with unclear orders and poor directives.
At one point in the campaign, he even believed his marshals’ souls were
"wanting," and that was why they could not see his orders through to
victory. In reality, it was Napoleon’s orders that proved wanting, and so he
found himself at Fontainebleau with only himself to blame for driving his
once-loyal marshals to turn on him.
To make this article easier
to read, we have removed the footnotes and list of sources from the version
shown here. To see a PDF version of this paper complete with footnotes, appendices, and bibliography,
click here.
This
article is copyright © 2009 Claudio Innocenti.
Reprint right granted to the The Napoleonic Historical Society by the
author.
Mission |
Join |
News |
Articles |
Events |
Links
Conferences | Membership News
| Young Guard |
Newsletter
Contact Us
Web site copyright © 2009 Claudio Innocenti.
The Napoleonic Historical Society is a 501(c)(3) not for profit corporation
|